Supreme Court of India
Nagar Palika Nigam v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972; s. 9(3) and Proviso: c Property tax - Levy of, in terms of s. 9 (3) of the Act - Challenge to in terms of Proviso to s.9(3) -Allowed by Single Judge of the High Court holding that appellant-Corporation had no jurisdiction to claim property tax from the petitioner for the building constructed on market yard - Correctness of - Held: Corporation did not challenge the proviso to s. 9(3) of the Adhiniyam allowing exemption from levying of tax on such property - Hence, no interference with the impugned order called for. Proviso to a Statute - Scope
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra (dead) through Lrs. & Ors.
- 2017 Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. v. Tarun Pal Singh & Ors.
- 2012 Rohitash Kumar & Ors. v. Om Prakash Sharma & Ors.
- 2022 Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2016 Suresh Chand Gautam v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- 2013 Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. v. Vemuganti Ramakrishan Rao & Ors.
Of those, 3 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.