Supreme Court of India
Mangat Ram v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Before parting with the matter, we may clarify that we have not entered into merits of the matter and we may not be understood to have expressed any opinion one way or the other on the issues in the case.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Order of High Court - Dismissing criminal appeal observing "reasons to follow" - HELD: The High Court ought c not to have disposed of appeal without recording reasons - Supreme Court has deprecated practice of disposing of matters and pronouncing final orders without recording reasons in support of such decision - It has been insisted that when matter is decided by a Court, reasons must be recorded 0 .. in support' of such decision - It would be appropriate and desirable if all courts including High Courts keep in mind the principles laid down by Supreme Court and pass final orders only after
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Rajan v. The State of Haryana
- 2021 Sudipta Chakrobarty & Anr. v. Ranaghat S.D. Hospital & Ors.
- 2025 Ravindra Pratap Shahi v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.