Supreme Court of India
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. v. Ayodhya Prasad Mishra and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons, we see no substance in the appeal filed by the Corporation, the same deserves to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed.
Judgment, page 22
From the headnote
Service law: Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board Service of Engineers Regulations, 1970: c Promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer - Criteria for - Executive Engineer placed in category I - Not promoted - Writ petition - Case of Employer-Corporation that Executive Engineers placed in category II were senior to "'." petitioner and their case were to be considered before the case of petitioner - High Court directed Corporation to offer first available vacancy of Superintending Engineer to petitioner and to promote him on said vacancy - Challenge against - Held: The sole criterion for
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Union of India and Others v. Munshi Ram
- 2019 Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (fogsi) v. Union of India and Others
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.