Supreme Court of India
Raghunandan v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the order of conviction and sentence recorded by the Sessions Court and confirmed by the High Court is legal and proper.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: s.302 r.w. s.34-Accused called deceased to this house-Deceased later found dead in the house of accused-Courts below convicted accused u/s.302-Justification of-Held: Justified as chain of circumstances was complete to connect accused with the crime-Evidence Circumstantial evidence. Judgment/Order : Remarks in the record-Deletion of-Trial Court negatived the assertion of PW/ that he was eye-witness of murder of his father-Court farther remarked that witness had falsely concocted certain facts-On facts and circumstances, remarks found unnecessary and uncalled for Ordered to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.