Supreme Court of India
State of Maharashtra v. Public Concern for Governance Trust and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the observations/strictures and remarks made by the High Court against the appellant behind his back F 'r is totally uncalled for and not warranted.
Judgment, page 25
From the headnote
Strictures : Expunction of adverse remarks-Chief Minister endorsing 'please put up' on application addressed to him for allotment of plots by Societies Applications forwarded to the Authority for pocessing-Allotment of land to the Societies-Unwarranted observations made against Chief Minister by High Court-Appeal by State for expunging of remarks-Held: Notation 'please put up' by Chief Minister merely means that the Department should process the applications in accordance with the procedure -It does not mean approval-High Court erred in making observations regarding notations made in files
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 State Bank of India & Ors v. Rajesh Agarwal & Ors
- 2014 Om Prakash Chautala v. Kanwar Bhan and Others
- 2011 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr.
- 2013 Sukhdev Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
Of those, 3 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.