Supreme Court of India
Hardesh Ores Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Hede & Co.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the respondent is right in contending that enforcement of the negative covenants presupposes the existence of a subsisting agreement.
Judgment, page 21
From the headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order II Rule 2; Order VII Rule 11 (d) limitation Act, I 963 : Articles 54, 58 & I/ 3-Agreements entered into by Jessee with lessor for extraction of ore during lease period-Exercise of option of renewal of lease by the Jessee was rejected by the lessor-Suit for perpetual injunction filed by the lessee before trial court to restrain the lessor from carrying on the work of extraction by asserting its exclusive right under the renewed agreement-Lessor filing an application before the trial court contending that the suit is for specific performance of the lease
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 M/s Frost International Limited v. M/s Milan Developers and Builders (p) Limited & Anr.
- 2020 Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (gajra) (d) Thr Lrs & Ors.
- 2018 Urvashiben & Anr. v. Krishnakant Manuprasad Trivedi
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.