Supreme Court of India
Suman Sood @ Kamal Jeet Kaur v. State of Rajasthan
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons, the appeal filed by Daya Singh deserves to be dismissed and is, accordingly, dismissed and the order of conviction and sentence recorded against him by the trial Court and confinned by the F High Court is upheld.
Judgment, page 26
From the headnote
Constitution of India-Article 33-Penal Code, 1860--Sections 120A, 1208, 343, 346, 353, 364A, 365, 420, 468 & 471-Explosive Substances Act, 1908-Sections 4 & 5-Extradition Act, 1962 as amended by Extradition c (Amendment) Act, 1993-Section 21-Accused, husband and wife, irrvolved in kidnapping-Accused were arrested and extradited from outside the country and were charged for offences of criminal conspiracy, kidnapping for ransom and wrongful confinement-Trial court corrvicted and sentenced both the accused for the charged offences and acquitted the accused-wife of offence of kidnapping for
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Shaik Ahmed v. State of Telangana
- 2015 Vikram Singh@ Vicky &anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2011 State of Rajasthan Th. Secy.home Dept. v. Abdul Mannan & Anr.
- 2011 Bhajan Singh @ Harbhajan Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
Of those, 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.