Supreme Court of India
Y. Saraba Reddy v. Puthur Rami Reddy and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, the High Court's order is clearly indefensible and is set aside.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-s.319-Scope and ambit a/ Omission of the name of a person from the array of accused, after investigation by Special Investigating Officer-Their names found in the FIR and statement of witnesses-Application u/s 319-Rejection of by trial Court-Affirmation thereof by High Court on the ground of delay and after examining reliability of evidence of the complainant-On appeal-Held: Power u/s 319 can be exercised suo motu or on application-However, it is extraordinary power, which should be used very sparingly-Trial Court has the jurisdiction to add a person in the
Where later benches applied it
- 2009 Sarbjit Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- 2008 Lal Suraj @ Suraj Singh & Anr. v. State of Jharkhand
- 2008 Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.