Supreme Court of India
Saroj Kumar Poddar v. State (nct of Delhi) & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Negotiable Instruments Act; ss. 138 and I 4 I: Dishonour of Cheque-Vicarious liability of director for commission of offences on the part of a Company-Held: Director liable only in the event condition precedent therefor in s. I 41 of the Act satisfied-Cheques in question not issued by appellant/director-No averments made in the complaint petition as to the manner, he was responsible for the conduct of business of company-Specific allegation requires to be made against the Director to make him vicariously liable in terms of provisions of law -Al/egationlaverments in the petition do not
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Gunmala Sales Private Ltd. v. Anu Mehta & Ors.
- 2016 Standard Chartered Bank v. State of Maharashtra and Others Etc.
- 2012 Aneeta Hada v. M/s. Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt. Ltd.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.