Supreme Court of India
Chairman, U.P. Jal Nigam and Anr. v. Radhey Shyam Gautam and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service Law: Retirement age-Employees of U. P. Jal Nigam-Service conditions-Held, would be same as applicable to State Government Services under rules, regulations or orders applicable to such government servants- c Age of retirement/superannuation of government servants increased by State Govt. from 58 to 60 years by amending R.56(a) of Fundamental Rules- Hence, same would equally apply to employees of Nigam-Administrative Law-Administrative decision-Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage, Act, 1975-s.37-Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam Engineers (Public Health Branch) Service Regulations, 1978.
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 State of Uttar Pradesh v. Dayanand Chakrawarty & Ors.
- 2021 New Okhla Industrial Development Authority & Anr. v. B D Singhal & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.