Supreme Court of India
Subhakar and Ors. v. Harideesh Kumar and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that in this case, the land in question is a Punja Land where only thatched grass is grown naturally.
Judgment, page 3
From the headnote
Land Reforms: Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961-S.2(18)-'Punja' land-Land not fit for cultivation-Only grass growing on it naturally-Hence, prayer to declare same as agricultural land rightly rejected by High Court. The land in question is 'Punja' land situated in the Dakshina Kannada District. The land is not fit for cultivation. Only grass is growing on it naturally. Prayer of Appellants for declaring such land as agricultural land was rejected by the High Court. Hence the present appeals. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD: bare reading of s.2(18) of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.