Supreme Court of India
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bacchudas@ Balaram and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Sections 378 and 386-Appeal against acquittal-Power of appellate court to review evidence-Scope of-Stated-On facts, on re-appreciation of evidence of witnesses, order of acquittal passed by High Court suffers from no infirmity to warrant interference-Penal Code, I 860-Section, 304 rlw 34. Criminal law-Two views-Possibility-Effect of-Held: If two views are possible on the evidence adduced in the case, one pointing to the guilt of the accused and the other to his innocence, the view favourable to the accused should be adopted-Criminal jurisprudence. According to
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Kanhaiya Lal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- 2011 State of Rajasthan Th. Secy.home Dept. v. Abdul Mannan & Anr.
- 2019 Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr v. Mohd. Parvez Abdul Kayuum Etc
- 2012 Govindaraju@ Govinda v. State by Sriramapuram P.S. & Anr.
- 2011 State of Rajasthan v. Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta
Of those, 2 referred to · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.