Supreme Court of India
S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881-Sections 138 and 141-Dishonor of 'r cheque-Offence by Company-Liability of Director-Director resigning two c years prior to issuance of cheque by Company-Held: Sufficient averment should be made against the Director in the complaint petition that the Director was incharge of and was responsible for the conduct of the business of the Company-Merely being a party to a purported resolution does not show that the Director was actively associated with the management of the affairs of the Company-Only the Managing Director was authorized to do certain acts on behalf
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Gunmala Sales Private Ltd. v. Anu Mehta & Ors.
- 2024 Muskan Enterprises & Anr. v. The State of Punjab & Anr.
- 2024 Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.