Supreme Court of India
State of A.P. v. A.S. Peter
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Resultantly, the notification issued withdrawing the consent to enable the State Police to further investigate into the case is patently invalid and unsustainable in law.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: ss. 36 and 482-Further investigation-Challenged for not obtaining prior permission of Magistrate-HELD: Law does not c mandate taking of prior permission from Magistrate for further investigation-Carrying out further investigation even after filing of charge-sheet is a statutory right of police-Investigation by CID cannot be said to be as taken up by a different agency-CID is a part of investigating agency of the State-Order of High Court quashing the criminal proceedings set aside-Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-s.482. first information report was lodged
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 State through Central Bureau of Investigation v. Hemendhra Reddy & Another. Etc.
- 2023 Bohatie Devi (dead) through Lr v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.