Supreme Court of India

Vinay Devanna Nayak v. Ryot Seva Sahakari Bank Ltd.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2007] 12 S.C.R. 1134
Bench C.K. Thakker J.
Decided 7 December 2007

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

For the foregoing reasons the appeal deserves to be allowed ( VINAYDEVANNANAYAK v.RYOTSEVASAHAKARI 1143 BANKLTD. [THAKKER,J.] and is accordingly allowed by holding that since the matter has been A compromised between the parties and the amount ofRs.45,000/-has been paid by the appellant towards full and final settlement to the respondent­ bank towards its dues, the appellant is entitled to acquittal.

Judgment, page 9

From the headnote

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; S. 38 and S. 147 (as inserted by amending Act 5512002-0.ffence u/s 138-Compounding of-Held: c Though technically provisions of s. 320 Cr PC do not apply to offences not covered by Penal Code, the fact as to compromise between the parties and payment of dues u/s 138 of the Act would be a relevant fact to allow compounding-In such matters normally compounding of offences should not be denied-Moreover, s. 147 also allows compounding ofoffencespunishable under the provisions of the Act- On facts, there exists no reason to refuse compromise between the parties as

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.