Supreme Court of India
Sangam Spinners v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-i
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above position in law, the judgments of the E Commissioner and the High Court are indefensible and are set aside.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Employees Provident Funds Act, l 952-s. l 6(1)(d)-Infancy protection-To newly set up factories, by way of exemption from applicability of the Act for 3 years-Omission of exemption provision in 1998 w.r.e.f 22-9-1997-Held: Irrespective of the omission, appellant factory, which was set up on 1-9-1995, entitled to protection for full 3 years startingfrom the date of set up-General Clauses Act 1897-s.6 (c). Repeal-Effect of, on accrued right-General Clauses Act 1897- s.6 (c). Interpretation of Statutes-Retrospective or prospective operation-Determination-Held: Every statute is prima facie
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 J.S. Yadav v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- 2019 Prashanti Medical Services & Research Foundation v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2015 Poonam v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.