Supreme Court of India
Harpal Singh v. State of Punjab
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987-ss. l 2, 18 and 20A(2)-Designated TADA Court-Jurisdiction of-To take cognizance of offences under other Acts than the TADA-Held: Designated TADA Court gets jurisdiction to try any other offence only if it has the jurisdiction and is trying an offence under TADA-On facts, since there was no sanction of the Inspector General of Police or of the Commissioner of Police as required under s.20- (2) a/TADA, the Designated TADA Court lacked inherent jurisdiction to try accused appellant for offence under TADA-Consequently, it could not have
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Devinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab through Cbi
- 2012 General Officer Commanding v. Cbi and Anr
- 2019 The State of Gujarat v. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya and Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.