Supreme Court of India
Delhi Development Authorlty v. Arun Lal Satija and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid, the High Court's view does not suffer from any infinnity to warrant interference.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
Land Laws: c Delhi Development Authority (Disposal of Developed Nazul Land) Rules, 1981; R.17: Allotment of Land-Son of deceased member of a Society entered into membership of the Society-Applicability of r.17-Held: R.17 of 1981 Rules regarding general restrictions to allotment of land for residential purpose applies to Nazul land-Appellant-authority neither claimed that the land in question was Nazul land nor any material placed before the High Court to justifY applicability of r.17-Hence, the question of applying r.17 to restrict allotment of land in favour of son of the deceased does not
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja
- 2007 Moradabad Development Authority v. Saurabh Jain and Ors.
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.