Supreme Court of India
Land Acquisition Officer, A.P. v. Kamandana Ramakrishna Rao and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons, the appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Land Acquisition: Land Acquisition Act, 1894; ss. 4(1) and 18/Notification dated c 3.01.1980 issued thereunder: Acquisition of land by State Government for a project-Compensation- Enhancement of-Reference Court enhanced the compensation on yield basis of crops by applying multiplier of 20 years capitalisation-High Court enhanced it further on the basis of market value of Land--On appeal, Held: ·. High Court did not commit any illegality in not deducting the amount of .... expenses for cultivation from compensation so enhanced as the claimant was -( entitled to compensation at a higher rate
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 K. Subbarayudu and Others v. The Special Deputy Collector (land Acquisition)
- 2017 Nelatur Sampoornamma W/o Srinivasulureddy v. Special Deputy Collector, L.A., Telugu Ganga Project, Podalakur at Nellore, Andhra Pradesh
- 2009 Navanath & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- 2007 The Kerala State Electricity Board v. Livisha Etc. Etc.
Of those, 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.