Supreme Court of India
Annakili v. A. Vedana Yagam and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
T Adverse possession-Mere possession of land is not enough- Possessor must have animus possidendi and hold the land adverse to the title of the true owner-For said purpose, not only animus c possidendi must be shown to exist, but the same must be shown to exist at the commencement of possession-He must continue in said capacity for the period prescribed under the Limitation Act-Mere long possession for a period of more than 12 years without anything more does not ripen into a title-Limitation Act, 1963-Article 65. Respondents purchased certain property from the Corporation of Madras. The
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors v. Manjit Kaur & Ors.
- 2023 Government of Kerala & Anr. v. Joseph and Others
- 2020 Shri Uttam Chand (d) through Lrs. v. Nathu Ram (d) through Lrs. & Ors.
- 2009 V. Laxminarasamma v. A. Yadaiah (dead) & Ors.
Of those, 1 referred to · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.