Supreme Court of India
State of Rajasthan v. Ajit Singh and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the other arguments raised by the learned counsel for the parties with regard to the recoveries etc. pale into insignificance and do not require any discussion.
Judgment, page 20
From the headnote
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987: ss. 3(3), 4(1), 15 and 21-Terroristacts and disruptive activities- On the statement of one of the accused that they had been smuggling arms and ammunition, 19 persons prosecuted-Confessions of other accused not indicating knowledge on their part that weapons were smuggled for use in terrorist activities-No question put to any accused u/s 313 Cr.P. . as to their involvement in any terrorist or disruptive activity-HELD: On facts, sine qua non for applicability of ss. 3 (3) and 4(1), i.e. "knowingly facilitates" commission of the
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Zakir Abdul Mirajkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- 2013 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi, Bombay
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.