Supreme Court of India
Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the appellant.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999-Sections 3(2), 21 ( 4) & 2 4-Printing of counterfeit stamps and stamp papers by Organised Crime Syndicate-Appellant is Advocate by profession and had been a Minister c in the State Government-Allegation that the counterfeit stamps were being sold under his protection-Charges under s.3(2) & 24-Judicial custody- !!!!!Po Entitlement of Appellant to bail-Held, entitled-Alleged conversation between - Appellant and Kingpin of the Syndicate may show acquaintance but may not per se be sufficient to prove direct role of Appellant. case was registered
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2019 National Investigation Agency v. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.