Legal Street registered trademark

Supreme Court of India

Rotash v. State of Rajasthan

Neutral citation
Reported as [2006] SUPP. 10 S.C.R. 264
Bench S.B. Sinha and Markandey Ka Tju JJ.
Decided 6 December 2006

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

10 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that the learned G Trial Judge and the High Court have not committed any error in passing the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence.

Judgment, page 13

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860; s.302 r/w s. 34: Murder-Joint liability-Accused-appellant and other accused committed murder-Trial Court found accused appellant and another accused, brother of deceased guilty of committing offences uls. 302 r/w s. 34 /PC, convicted and sentenced them accordingly-Affirmed by High Court-On appeal, Held: PW!, another brother of deceased and PW6, mother of deceased named all the accused persons in their statement recorded by Police- Though some discrepancies noticed as regards actual overt act played by them but same is not of much significance-Even assuming that PW6 did not

Authorities it was built on

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 8 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.