Supreme Court of India
Mohammed Arshad v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that whereas the findings of the learned Sessions Judge as also the High Court in regard to guilt of Appellant No.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Evidence Act-S.32- Dying declarations-Three dying declaration made by deceased-Role attributed to accused in third declaration did not find mention in first two dying declarations-Accused stated to havz assaulted deceased with stick on his back-No such injury was found on his person Held, he is entitled to benefit of doubt-Penal Code, 1860-ss.302134. Penal Code, 1860-ss.302134-Deceased had an altercation with accused on two earlier occasions about which he had lodged a report Evidence of eyewitnesses and Doctor, that vital injury could be inflicted with an article which overt act was
Where later benches applied it
- 2008 Samadhan Dhudaka Koli v. State of Maharashtra
- 2007 Mehiboobsab Abbasabi Nadaf v. State of Karnataka
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.