Supreme Court of India

Bapu v. State of Maharashtra

Neutral citation

Reported as [2006] SUPP. 9 S.C.R. 52

Bench S.B. Sinha and Markandey Ka Tju JJ.

Decided 16 November 2006

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

From the headnote

Evidence Act, 1872-s.32: .. c Three dying declarations-One each before the Executive Magistrate and the Head Constable-Third one before relatives of deceased-All of them implicating deceased's husband as the culprit-Conviction based on the dying declarations-Justification of-Held, justified-Evidence of Executive •, Magistrate, Doctor and other witnesses unequivocal that deceased was conscious and able to answer the questions-No reason to disbelieve the dying declarations especially since there is consistency between all of them- Penal Code, 1860-S.302. Deceased gave three dying declarations

Authorities it was built on

1992 Smt. Paniben v. State of Gujarat cited by 50
1982 Mohanlal Gangaram Gehani v. State of Maharashtra cited by 35

Where later benches applied it

2014 Prempal v. Statf. of Haryana relied on

Of those, 1 relied on

Sign in free to read it

The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing

An email address, no password.