Supreme Court of India
Rajesh Ranjan Yadav @ Pappu Yadav v. Cbi through its Director
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Bail-Grant of-Considerations for-Held: Mere fact that the accused has undergone long period of incarceration (six years in this case) would c not entitle him to be enlarged on bail-Court has also to consider other facts "'( and circumstances, such as interest of the society-Balance to be struck between right to individual liberty and interest of society-On facts, investigation is over; even trial is partly over and allegations against the accused are serious-Conduct of accused also not proper-In such circumstances, accused does not deserve bail-Constitution of India, 1950- Articles 21 &
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Omprakash Sahni v. Jai Shankar Chaudhary & Anr. Etc.
- 2019 Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar
- 2026 Arvind Dham v. Directorate of Enforcement
- 2010 Rabindra Nath Singh v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr.
- 2023 Ritu Chhabaria v. Union of India & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 distinguished · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.