Supreme Court of India
Union of India and Anr. v. M/s. V.S. Engineering (p) Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Before parting with this case we may also observe that Railways and Public institutions are very slow in reacting to the request made by a contractor for appointment of the arbitrator.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996-Section I I-Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal for Railways-High Court not justified in appointing an arbitrator under S.11 when Railway authorities already constituted arbitral tribunal as per the General Conditions of Contract. Respondent-Contractor was awarded a work contract by railways for supply of crushed stone ballast and for loading the same into wagons. The dispute arose and respondent sought appointment of arbitrator under Clause 64 of General Conditions of Contract. The arbitral tribunal was appointed to adjudicate the claim. Subsequently,
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 G H Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. M/s Eci-spic-smo-mcml (jv)joint Venture Company
- 2019 Union of India v. Pradeep Vinod Construction Company
- 2019 Union of India v. Parmar Construction Company
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.