Supreme Court of India
Manish Ratan and Ors. v. State of M.P. and Ors
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code a/Criminal Procedure, 1973-Sections 177 and 178-Jurisdiction of court to take cognizance of offence, where no part of cause of action has arisen-Held: Every offence should ordinarily be inquired into and tried by Court within whose jurisdiction it is committed-On facts, no criminal case alleging mal-treatment and dowry demand registered at the place of incident but another local area-High Court holding that offence being a continuing one, Court where no part of cause of action arose has the jurisdiction, not correct-Offence cannot be a continuing one only because complainant was /meed to
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Swaati Nirkhi & Ors. v. State (nct of Delhi) & Ors.
- 2023 Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka and Ors. Etc.
- 2019 Rupali Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- 2014 Amarendu Jyoti & Ors. v. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.