Supreme Court of India

The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Pudukottai, Tamilnadu v. A. Parthiban

Neutral citation

Reported as [2006] SUPP. 7 S.C.R. 35

Bench Arijit Pasayat J.

Decided 9 October 2006

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

From the headnote

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w Section J 3(l)(d). Offences under Ss. 7 and 13(2) rlw S. 13(l)(d)-Conviction under Release on probation-Justifiability of-Accused convicted under S. 7 & 13(2) rlw S. J 3(J)(d)-Accused was sentenced to undergo RI for six months and to pay afine of Rs. 5001-for the earlier offence and RI for one year and c to pay a fine of Rs. 1, 0001- for the latter offence-High Court held that the conviction under S. 13(2) read with S. 13(/)(d) was n~t maintainable but confirmed the conviction under S. 7-High Court further held that for a single

Authorities it was built on

1978 Superintendent, Central Excise, Bangalore v. Bahubali cited by 3

Where later benches applied it

2013 Shyam Lal Verma v. Central Bureau of Investigation relied on
2025 Chellammal and Another v. State Represented by the Inspector of Police referred to
2016 Mohd. Hashim v. State of Up & Ors. referred to

Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing

An email address, no password.