Supreme Court of India
S.N. Chandrashekar and Anr. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons unable to accept the submission of Mr.
Judgment, page 20
From the headnote
Karanataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 as amended by Amendment Act 1 of 2005-Sections 14, 14- and 15-Grant of sanction by the State for change of land use from residential to commercial purpose to run a restaurant-Validity of sanction under. the Act-Held, changes in the land use must conform to the Outline Development Plan and Zoning Regulations-Restaurant is not permissible under the Zoning Regulations- On facts, the sanction order authorising change in land use does not conform to section 14- and its proviso of the Act-Circumstance necessitating such change of user has not been
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 R.K. Mittal & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- 2021 Rajeev Suri v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.