Supreme Court of India
U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Mitthu Singh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Labour Laws: Re-instatement of terminated workman-Back wages-Entitlement to- Held: Court/Tribunal has discretionary power to grant back wages keeping in view factual scenario and principles of justice, equality and good conscience-;Entitlement of a workman to get re-instatement does not necessarily result in payment of back wages-On facts, workman concerned had committed misconduct on three different occasions-Also his services were never found satisfactory-In such circumstances, Courts below erred in granting back wages. Respondent, working as bus driver with Appellant-corporation, allegedly
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 Chairman-cum-m.d., Coal India Ltd., & Ors. v. Ananta Saha & Ors.
- 2008 M.D. Balasaheb Desai Sahakari S.K. Ltd. v. Kashinath Ganapati Kambale
- 2008 Kanpur Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. v. Shamim Mirza
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.