Supreme Court of India
Tanaji Ramchandra Nimhan v. Swati Vinayak Nimhan and Ors
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the election petitioner E has not supplied adequate material in support of her prayer for an order of recount and there is no sufficient reason for ordering a recount.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Election laws: Election dispute-Recounting-Sought on grounds (a) counting staff failed to show ballot papers to candidate or their agent before bundling them (b) improper identification of invalid votes (c) announcement of prize for returning officer who finished counting and announced the results first resulted in hasty counting-Small Cause Court and High Court directing recounting--On appeal, held: Nothing specific was established either regarding irregularity in process that was undertaken or segregation of votes secured by candidates-The announcement of prize was bona fide and, apart from
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 Kalyan Singh Chouhan v. C.P. Joshi
- 2006 Sadhu Singh v. Darshan Singh and Anr.
- 2006 Gursewak Singh v. Avtar Singh and Ors.
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.