Supreme Court of India
Kushum Lata v. Union of India and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Resultantly they loose faith in the E administration of our judicial system.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1963; Rule 23: Auction of Mines of sand-One of the lenderers, not allowed to participate-Filing of writ petition/Public Interest litigation-Dismissed by High Court--On appeal, Held: Petitioner has styled the writ petition as Public Interest Litigation though it relates to a tender where she herself claimed to be a tenderer- petition on the same cause of action pending in the High Court wherein she is one of the parties-Under the circumstances, High Court was fully justified in dismissing the petition styled as PIL. Public Interest
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Ghanshyam Upadhyay v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- 2019 Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr v. Mohd. Parvez Abdul Kayuum Etc
- 2012 Kishore Samrite v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.