Supreme Court of India
Chani v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Ss. 360, 361/Probation of Offenders Act, 1958; Section 4: Modification of judgment delivered by High Court in a criminal appeal- Section 4 of the Probation Act vis-a-vis Section 360 of the Code-Applicability of-Held: Where provisions of the Probation Act applicable, Section 360 of the Code should not be pressed into service, otherwise it would result in highly undesirable consequences not intended by the legislature-Courts could apply provisions of one of these beneficial Acts by assigning special reasons thereof-Enforcement of provisions of Probation Act in
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Sanjay Dutt (a-117) v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi (stf), Bombay
- 2011 State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & Ors. Etc
- 2012 Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 distinguished
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.