Supreme Court of India
Budh Singh and Ors. v. State of U.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the High Court was not correct in arriving at the conclusion that the view of the Trial Court was wholly perverse and could not be sustained on the materials brought on record by the prosecution.
Judgment, page 26
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860/Arms Act, 1959-Sections 148, 302 and 30711491 Section 27-Murder of two and attempt to murder one-Prosecutionfor Lacuna in investigation-Prosecution case not supported by medical evidence-Non-examination of some of the eye-witnesses-Two of the witnesses were related witnesses-Delay in post mortem examination and in medical examination of the injured eye-witness-Acquittal by Trial Court Conviction by High Court-On appeal, held: Acquittal justified in view of facts of the case. Appeal-Appeal against acquittal-Scope of Interference-Power of appellate court-Held: Ordinarily
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 S. Ganesan v. Rama Raghuraman &.ors
- 2012 Anand Mohan v. State of Bihar
- 2012 Jugendra Singh v. State of U.P.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.