Supreme Court of India

Panchanan Ohara and Ors. v. Monmatha Nath Maity (dead) Th. Lrs. & Anr.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2006] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 520
Bench S.B. Sinha and P.P. Naolekar JJ.
Decided 12 May 2006

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that the plea raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the suit was barred by limitation cannot be accepted as all the courts have arrived at a finding of fact that the period for execution of the deed of sale had been extended.

Judgment, page 14

From the headnote

Limitation Act, 1963-Article 54-Agreement for sale of immoveable property-Vendee requesting vendor to execute and register a sale deed in its favour and latter in response assuring them that it would do so--However, thereafter execution refused on the plea that it was barred by limitation--­ Vendee filing suit for specific performance of agreement for sale-Bar of limitation-Held-Suit was not barred by limitation as courts below had given a finding of fact that period of performance of agreement has been extended, and in such a case, the time to file a suit shall be deemed to start running

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 3 mentioned

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.