Supreme Court of India
Purushottam Kumar Jha v. Sta Te of Jharkhand and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons, in our opinion, the order dated 6th January, 2003 compulsorily retiring the appellant cannot be held illegal, unlawful or contrary to law and neither the Single Judge nor the Division Bench had E committed any error of law in dismissing the petition and the Letters Patent Appeal of the appellant.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000-Sections 72 and 74-Appointment of employee as a Clerk by erstwhile State of Bihar on compassionate grounds Transfer of employee to the State of Jharkand after bifurcation of the States- Employee protesting to do the work of a Clerk contending that he was originally appointed as Law Officer/Legal Assistant-Order of compulsory retirement passed against the employee by the State of Jharkand after holding disciplinary proceedings-Writ petition filed before High Court challenging the order-Employee contending that the State of Jharkhand has not power and
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.