Supreme Court of India
Pratap Singh and Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that it cannot be said to be a case where the views of the learned Trial Judge could be said to be perverse meriting reversal thereof at the hands of the High Court.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Evidence: Minor-Witness-Contradiction in statement-Effect of-Minor stating that he went directly to his father and narrated the incident to him, whereas according to another witness, minor came to him first and then went to his father-Acquittal by Trial Court on the ground that the evidence of minor appeared doubtful-Correctness of-Held: Trial Court did not err in holding that suspicion had arisen as regards the correctness of statement made by minor and he might have been tutored Non-examination of eye witness-Effect of Non-examination of seizure witness-Effect of-Held: Seizure of material
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr v. Mohd. Parvez Abdul Kayuum Etc
- 2012 Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin & Anr.
- 2021 Bhagchandra v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2013 Safi Mohd. v. State of Rajasthan
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.