Supreme Court of India
Harwindra Kumar v. Chief Engineer, Karmik and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service Law: Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975-Sections 37 and 97-Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules-Rule 56(a)(as amended by Uttar Padesh Fundamental (Amendment) Rules, 2002)-Uttar Pradesh Jal Niga'!' Engineers (Public Health Branch) Service Regulations-Regulation 31- Superannuation age-Enhancement by the Rule-For employees of State Government-Applicability of to the employees of Jal Nigam-By the provisions of the Act and Regulations, service conditions of the employees of the State Government made applicable to the employees of the Nigam-Held: In view of the provisions of the
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 State of Uttar Pradesh v. Dayanand Chakrawarty & Ors.
- 2022 State of U.P. & Ors. v. Virendra Kumar & Ors.
- 2021 New Okhla Industrial Development Authority & Anr. v. B D Singhal & Ors.
- 2014 State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Ors.
- 2006 Chairman, U.P. Jal Nigam and Anr. v. Jaswant Singh and Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.