Supreme Court of India
State of Karnataka v. Laxuman
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the respondents are not entitled to claim any enhancement by recourse to Section 18 of the Act.
Judgment, page 21
From the headnote
Land Acquisition: Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 18 (as amended and adopted in State of Karnataka)-Reference to Court-Application under S. 18(3)(b)-Limitation period-Applicability of S. 5 of the Limitation Act-Notice of award under S. 12(2) served on the claimant-Claimant filed application under S. 18(1) seeking reference within c 90 days as laid down in S. 18(2)-Deputy Commissioner failed to make a reference within 90 days as laid down in S. l 8(3)(a)-Claimant approached civil court under S. 18(3)(b) after JO years-Application for condonation of delay under S. 5 of the Limitation Act
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Mahavir & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- 2020 Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.
- 2018 Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra (dead) through Lrs. & Ors.
- 2009 M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. S.U.T.N.I. Sangam & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.