Supreme Court of India
M/s. Sait Nagjee Purushotham and Co. Ltd. v. Vimalabai Prabhulal and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Rent Control and Eviction: Kera/a Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965: Section I I (3)-Bonafide need, premises required for expansion of business-Eviction-Maintainability of-Held: It is always the privilege of landlord to choose nature and place of business-Tenant cannot dictate terms c to landlord-Plea that need of expanding business at the suit premises not bonafide since landlord and his sons are already having business at other places and one son has settled abroad, is unsustainable-Furthermore, landlord-dispute takes long time and one cannot wait indefinitely nor development of
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Rajasthan State Tpt Corpn. & Anr. v. Bajrang Lal
- 2017 Laurel Energetics Pvt. Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
- 2010 Ritesh Tewari & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- 2010 Rajasthan Pradesh V.S. Sardarshahar and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
- 2007 Santosh Ajit Sachdevand Ors. v. Anoopi Shahani
Of those, 1 relied on · 4 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.