Supreme Court of India
Rahul Agarwal v. Rakesh Jain and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, we set aside the impugned order and direct the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Katni, to restore the case to the file, proceed in accordance with law and dispose of the same on merits at an early date.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: S.321-Withdrawal from prosecution-Trial of accused under ss. 341, 295 and 506(2) r!w s.34 /PC- Case posted for examination of accused- Application for withdrawal of prosecution by Asstt. Public Prosecutor contending that accused was not a habitual criminal-Rejected by trial court and revisional court but allowed by High Court for delay at the trial-Held, reason given by High Court is not correct-When trial was to be over, High Court should not have allowed it to be withdrawn-High Court's order set aside. Pending a land dispute between appellant and respondent
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 2 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.