Supreme Court of India
Kerala State Electricity Board v. Hitech Electrothermics and Hydropower Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered view that this review petition must be rejected.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
Constitution of India, 1950-Article 137-Reappreciation of evidence in a review petition-Scope of-Held: lt is not within the domain of Review Court to reappreciate evidence-Once the Court records finding of facts on appreciation of evidence and reaches a conclusion, that conclusion cannot be assailed in review unless it is shown that there is error apparent on the face of record-To pern1it the review petitioner to argue on a question of appreciation of evidence would an1ount to converting a review petition into an appeal in disguise. Government of Kerala had announced Industrial policy
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 S. Madhusudhan Reddy v. V. Narayana Reddy and Others
- 2013 Kamlesh Verma v. Mayawati and Ors.
- 2024 Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana & Ors.
- 2024 The State of Telangana & Ors. v. Mohd. Abdul Qasim (died) Per Lrs.
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.