Supreme Court of India
Vellikannu v. R. Singaperumal and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Hindu Succession Act, 1956--Sections 25 and 27 rlw Sections 6 and 8-Coparcenery property-Succession-Disqualification-Respondent No.1 murdered his father, who died intestate-Deceased was already divorced-He was survived by Respondent No. I- his only son and the sole male survivor and Appellant- the daughter-in-law-Properties of the deceased were joint family properties and the parties were governed by Mitakshara School of Hindu Law-Question of succession-Held: Respondent no. I having murdered his father, will be deemed to have pre-deceased him and would be disqualified from inheriting the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma & Ors.
- 2023 Revanasiddappa & Anr. v. Mallikarjun & Ors.
- 2013 C.B.I. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.