Supreme Court of India
Raju S. Jethmalani and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Before parting with the case we may observe that we tried to explore the possibility ifthe Municipal Corporation is still prepared to acquire the land then even at this point of time we can permit them to acquire the F land keeping in view the larger interest of ecology and for the amenities to the public of that locality.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
Municipal Corporation: Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Private land earmarked Jo; purpose of garden in the development plan, not acquired by the Corporation-Proposal of owner of land for its de reservation allowed-Challenged by residents of the area-High Court directing owner to find an alternate plot within 2 years and on failure to set aside de reservation-Correctness of-Held, High Court erred in placing the burden on the owner of land-Development plan comprising of private land cannot be implemented unless such land is acquired-Corporation and Government having
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Bhusawal Municipal Council v. Nivrutti Ramchandra Phalak & Ors.
- 2011 Shri Girish Vyas & Anr.. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.