Supreme Court of India
Viveka Nand Sethi v. Chairman, J. and K., Bank Ltd. and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the appeal preferred by the Bank should be allowed and that of the workman should·be dismissed.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Labour Law: Bipartite Settlement between Bank and workmen-Clause 2-Providing voluntary cessation of employment by employee on absenting from duty- Interpretation and applicability of-Workman not resuming duty nor filing proper medical leave application after expiry of leave and also not giving satisfactory explanation for his absence despite repeated opportunities Services dispensed with-Award directing reinstatement in service-Upheld by High Court-On appeal held: Bipartite Settlement being an admitted document is to be considered in its proper perspective by Tribunal-Filing of medical leave
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Rajeev Suri v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors
- 2020 State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh and Ors.
- 2011 Automotive Tyre Manufacturers Association v. The Designated Authority & Ors.
Of those, 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.