Supreme Court of India
Anwarul Haq v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860-Section 324-Prosecutionfor causing grievous injury -Non-recovery of weapon of offence-Medical opinion proving use of the weapon-Account of eyewitnesses-Conviction by Courts below-On appeal, held: Jn view of evidence of eyewitnesses and medical opinion conviction justified-Non-recovery of weapon cannot be a ground to discard evidence of eye-witnesses. Practice and Procedure : Plea raised for the first time before Supreme Court--He/d: Not [) permissible. Words and Phrases : 'Dangerous weapon '-Meaning of in the context of Section 324 /PC. i Appellant-accused alongwith 3 other
Where later benches applied it
- 2015 Nanda Gopalan v. State of Kerala
- 2013 Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
- 2020 Ahmad Ali Quraishi and Anr. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.