Supreme Court of India
Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola Inc.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that no fault can be found with the impugned judgment of the High Court under appeal.
Judgment, page 23
From the headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (as amended in 2001)-Section 129; Letters Patent of 1865-Clause 37-Chartered High Courts-Proceedings on the Original Side are governed by Rules made by High Court and not by the Code of Civil Procedure-High Court has discretion to grant extension of time for filing written statement without being affected by Order 8 rule 1 of amended CPC-The non obs/ante clause used in Section 129 is not merely declaratory, but indicative of Parliament's intention to prevent the application of the CPC in respect of civil proceedings on the Original Side of the High Courts. Code
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 The State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. v. Shaheena Masarat & Anr.
- 2021 Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Anr.
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.