Supreme Court of India
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation and Anr. v. S.G. Kotturappa and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Labour laws: Badli workers-Status and rights o/--Held: Badli worker does not enjoy any status as a worker-His services are not protected and can be terminated if found unsatisfactory like that of a probationer-Status of temporary employee is higher than Badli worker-Rights of Badfi workers are not absolute in nature-He can raise dispute with regard to wrongful termination of services only on violation of mandatory statutory provisions. Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950-Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (Cadre and Recruitment) Regulation, 1982-RegulatiOns 4(6) and 10(5)-Badli
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Tamil Nadu and Puducherry Paper Cup Manufactures Association v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors
- 2021 Rajeev Suri v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors
- 2020 State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh and Ors.
- 2005 Manager, R.B.I., Bangalore v. S. Mani and Ors.
Of those, 3 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.