Supreme Court of India
P.S. Sairam and Anr. v. P.S. Rama Rao Pisey and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the defendants succeeded in proving that Sadasiva Rao duly executed the D Will in question and, consequently, the plaintiff shall not be entitled to claim any share in the property described as item no. 3 in the Schedule.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Hindu Law: Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Explanation to Section 6A and Amendment made thereunder vide Karnataka Amendment Act, 1990: Suit for partition of property at item Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the Schedule and rendition of accounts of joint family business-Defendant No. 1 bequeathing property at item No.3 of the Schedule-Challenge to-Trial Court decreed the suit holding that Execution of Will not proved and that properties at item Nos. 2, 3 and 4 acquired by defendant No. 1 (father of plaintijj) out of the joint family business-However, property at item No.4 not available for partition as it
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.